If your going to put it on your website then make sure you know the FACTS!
You know who you are!
I try very hard to keep updated on new discoveries in the genetic world and work very closely with some very astute
and high profiled geneticists.  There is no reason but laziness to put things on websites that is nothing but conjuncture, outdated
and even worst PROVEN wrong some years ago.  Not only do these folks use an outdated and proven wrong article
that has been modified by just about every person that ever posted it on their website but most of them still have outdated
information on the brindle gene as well.
 
What I already KNEW is published below
Excerpts from:
Deafness and the Merle Gene
George M. Strain, PhD
Professor of Neuroscience
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA

Results from classical genetic studies in the last century identified at least ten genetic loci that determine coat color and pattern, represented by the letters A, B, C, D, E, G, M, P, S, and T.2 Two of these genes, S (piebald) and M (merle), have been linked to the appearance of congenital hereditary deafness...
Many of the breeds that carry merle also carry piebald. Whether it linked to S, M, or other causes, congenital deafness has been identified in nearly 90 breeds, nearly all of which carry piebald, merle, or both....
Relatively few studies of the merle gene have been published, most coming from studies of a breeding colony of merle dachshunds kept at a university in Hanover, Germany.  From these limited studies of an inbred population in one breed, subsequent authors have, unfortunately, extrapolated the reported findings to apply to all merle-carrying breeds. Current work in our and other laboratories and the experiences of many breeders have shown that the actions of merle have usually been over-stated.  Hearing was tested using the brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER), determining the threshold to click stimuli under sedation. Any threshold above 20 dB was considered to be abnormal, not because that is an accepted standard, but because one of their non-merle dogs had a 20 dB hearing threshold. Only one dog – a double merle male – was totally deaf in both ears (threshold > 90 dB) and none of the dogs were totally deaf in only one ear (unilaterally deaf). Looked at this way, true bilateral deafness occurred in 9.1% (1/11) of the double merles and
0% of the single merles.
... the hearing loss reported in these dachshunds that can be attributed to a genetic cause is much lower than stated in the
published English abstract of this German publication.

Breeding two merle dogs is not recommended.

Homozygous Dominant MM (Double Merle) is defective, often with deafness and perhaps blindness (including the possibility of small improperly formed eyes (Willis, 1989 p.229)). Sensory, neurological and immune system defects can occur in dogs from merle to merle breedings. The eye’s appearance may be distorted, lack of the reflective substance (tapetum lucidum) that lines the back of the dogs eye, night blindness and other visual problems can occur. Deafness or hearing loss has also been noted. White in excess or dilution in a dog of any color can result in hearing problems. Deafness in double merles appears to result from the absence of melanocytes in the ear. The hearing apparatus fails to develop properly if melanocytes are absent from part of the lining of part of the apparatus of the inner ear (Strain, 1996).

Double merle twice dilutes dark coat colors, and double merle have almost white coats with patches of faint color. Blue merles, Chocolate merles, and Sable Merles are heterozygous (Mm). However, they do not have these defects like the double merle (MM) even though they have a copy of the M allele.
Merle to Non-merle is the "safe" breeding, it does not produce double merle (MM) individuals.

*************************************************************************************
For those of you who do not understand technical or long-drawn out articles ...

Here are the facts!!!!!!!!

By BAER STANDARDS 0% of single merles and only 1 of 11 double merle actually had hearing problems.

SHAME on those of you who try to deceive others.

Fact is that SINGLE Merles have not been shown to have any more hearing issues than the traditional piebald.

 

Please do not believe what you read on gossip boards as these kind of folks spend more time gossiping than they do on researching
or keeping documentation on their own dogs to know what the facts are within the genetic world and their own bloodlines.
 
The only merles studies in Rat Terriers that I'm aware of were ones done on my own dogs and ALL of my merles (*single merle) -
some 122 over 26 years have shown to be completely normal in both eyes and hearing.
I don't think you have to be a rocket-scientist to do the math!

My Dad once said
 "Those that don't have enough sense to use their brain  have "2" holes to blow wind through!"



It's ironic how MANY that continue to put down those who breed Merles are the ones that have the most dogs with health issues 

  SEE for YOURSELF - CLICK HERE 

  such as PLL, Luxating Patellas and other health issues .

  Don't buy one based on color and/or pattern. 

 
  Don't buy one based on Champion Titles.
Many Championed dogs have extensive health issues - yet they continue to breed these dogs! 
  Click Here - Proof - Seeing is Believing  
 
  Buy one based on HEALTH 
  PROVEN HEALTH